Showing posts with label Poverty. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Poverty. Show all posts

Friday, February 14, 2014

A Valentine's Day Tale

A Valentine's Day Tale - A Time We Must Never Forget by Daniel Hanning


.

[caption id="attachment_2203" align="aligncenter" width="630"]Daniel Hanning of The Other Shoe Daniel Hanning of The Other Shoe[/caption]

.

            Welcome back My Dear Readers to The Other Shoe. Today, Friday February 14th, 2014 is Valentine’s Day for most people here in America. However, today holds a different provenance, for yours truly.  When I was a very young boy, I would guess I was six or seven. My paternal Grandfather was visiting our home, Cecil Hanning.  

.

He did not visit us, since we had moved from Foster street, closer to downtown Houston. Therefore, when he visited I was always wanting to spend the most time with him. Grandfather Hanning.. was very sad , on this Valentine’s Day. I could see it in his eyes, I felt it in him when I hugged. There was a great sadness in him, and… being the diligent young grandson… I wanted to help lift his sadness. That act, of a very young Danny would… forever change Valentine’s day… for me.

.

I apologize, that if upon reading, that my retelling to this tale… might color your Valentine’s Day. For many, that grew up with me... back in Houston and later in Pearland do not know of this day. Today, you learn more about me… my family… my upbringing… my family’s past. While living on Foster street, in Houston, my Grandfather would take me into the basement of our home and tell me… of the Jewish heritage our family… mostly ignored.

.

My paternal grandfather was separated from my paternal grandmother. Drink, and the making of and distribution of alcohol, was the impetuous for their separation. My grandfather still drank, but not today. Today, he took me into the backyard and we sat under a great cottonwood tree, in the corner of the backyard. I was six… it was February, so this would have been 1964. Our President Kennedy had been lost to the world, just months before.

.

It was on February 14th, 1964 that my paternal grandfather told me of another time. A time past, but one he feared might well return. That return is why at such a young age or six years old, my grandfather sat me under our cottonwood tree and explained to me… ‘The Final Solution’[1].

.

  MY father was a late convert to the Jewish faith. However, do not mistake is conversion later in life for a lack of understanding of his new faith. He left his Catholic childhood, and upbringing, to join in marriage with the woman is his dreams, my paternal grandmother. She was Jewish, born and raised in an area referred to as The Black Forest in northern Germany. They met on the streets of New York City, both in their early twenties and both newly minted American Immigrants. So much, my paternal grandfather, loved his soon to be wife, he embraced her religion and converted to Judaism.

.

On that Valentine’s Day I spent several hours in my backyard listening intently to my grandfather tell a tale of Nationalism and angry division. He explained how a wounded Germany sought to heal it’s wounds by engaging in a state of “Super Nationalism”. Then, how the Brown Shirts and later many elements of the Nationalized party sought to make the Jewish people a scapegoat for all their hard feelings. How this nationalist fervor was quickly transformed into angry dividing prejudge. How quickly that translated into the greatest slaughter of a people in modern times.

.

Remember, the time was early 1964. America was divided, itself, on the issue of equality for African America’s right of the vote. He would sit at home, alone, and watch as these people were set upon by dogs. Had fire hoses turned upon them, and even hanged in public gatherings. He did not focus of the brutality of the great Holocaust he sought to draw lines. Lines between a national frame of mind and the corresponding, following, grave actions.

.

You see, My Dear Readers, Valentine’s Day could not pass without him thinking of his “Jewish bride” (his words) without thinking of the great anger, and the dividing power of prejudice that brought his people to the very edge of extinction. He drew parallels between how America ignored Germany’s enslavement, then extinction of the Jewish people for years and years. Then he drew lines, again, between America’s intentional ignorance of wrongdoing, to that he saw… again, today. (1964)

.

The shank of the day was gone, and I remember seeing an urgency in his face, and his words, towards the end. MY father would soon be home from work, and he would not be allowed to spend time alone with me, once my father arrived. I never understood why, but my father did not like me spending time alone with my paternal grandfather. On this day, I remember wishing time would slow, just for my grandfather to have time… time to tell me what was weighing on his so.

.

The next thirty minutes will never leave me; they are engrained into my very soul. He warned me, with remembrances of his childhood and as a young man at the time of ‘The Final Solution’. How America stood silent, while millions of his people were firs enslaved, then marched into gas chambers. He spoke like every work mattered more than the last. He spoke with an urgency, yet reverence that I have never heard again. What did he warn me of?

.

 Cecil, on that Valentine’s Day cautioned me. To watch for a nation, gripped in greed and drowning in reoccurring flows of nationalism. He did not say “it might happen again some day”. No, his words of warning were much more… precise, much more severe. On that fateful Valentine’s Day my paternal grandfather charged me with a task. A task that will follow me through out my life. The task of watching for a time when our nation is both gripped in greed and avarice. A time when, either due invasion or war, is gripped with waves of nationalism.

.

Cecil, on that day, told me that it would happen again. That mankind is a creature destined to repeat his greatest sins, time and again. That I should watch for a time, when greed and avarice are seen as desirable attributes. Following, or at the same time, as a nation drowning in flows of nationalism A pride in our country not earned by act or inclusiveness of all citizens. No, a nationalism born out of division. That when, not if, I see these two occurrences… To guard my words.

.

It was at this time that my father came into the backyard, home from work. He took me up, into his arms, and brought my grandfather and me into the house. We had dinner, later that night, and then my father drove his father home. Later, my father, he would ask me what we were talking about. I told him just stories about his time with his wife, my grandmother. I did not want to worry my father. You see, it was not his charge that was given on that fateful Valentine’s Day. The charge. Was mine.

.

As always I am deeply honored that you come here and read my work.

.

Thank YOU!

.

[caption id="" align="aligncenter" width="234"]The Other Shoe eBay Store The Other Shoe eBay Store[/caption]

.

[caption id="attachment_2296" align="aligncenter" width="630"]The Other Shoe's Daniel Hanning The Other Shoe's Daniel Hanning[/caption]


 




 

Wednesday, January 8, 2014

War on Poverty - Part Two

.




[caption id="attachment_2106" align="aligncenter" width="630"]President Lyndon Banies Johnson State of the Union 1-8-1964 President Lyndon Banies Johnson State of the Union 1-8-1964[/caption]

.

           Welcome back My Dear Readers to The Other Shoe. In yesterday’s article I did not manage to elaborate, on the war on poverty, as much as I wanted. I wanted to convey the current level of poverty, in our great nation, and that progress has been impaired. The war on poverty was started, by (TEXAN) President L.B.J. on January 8th, 1964 with a mandate laid out in his State of the Union speech. Today, I want to share more of the climate in which these programs (making up the War On Poverty) were created, and how these programs have been undermined and gutted.

.

First, let me take you all back to 1964 and the political climate in Washington, D.C. This is done, best, with words from the very State of the Union we mark the 50th Anniversary, today.

.

        “Last year's congressional session was the longest in peacetime history. With that foundation, let us work together to make this year's session the best in the nation's history.”[1]

.

Our last two sessions of Congress have been (rightfully) labeled;

.

“The least productive Congress(s) in history…”[2]

.

Contrast our current majority party’s Congressional record with the Congress of 1963. Further President Johnson said;

.

        “Let this session of Congress be known as the session which did more for civil rights than the last hundred sessions combined; … as the session which declared all-out war on human poverty and unemployment in these United States; as the session which finally recognized the health needs of all our older citizens; as the session which reformed our tangled transportation and transit policies… and as the session which helped to build more homes, more schools, more libraries, and more hospitals than any single session of Congress in the history of our Republic.”[3]

This is what it sounds/looks like when a President sets an agenda for an upcoming Congress. This is what it is to have a President feel the weight of legacy upon him, brought on by a great predecessor.

.

[caption id="attachment_2105" align="aligncenter" width="224"]President Lyndon Banies Johnson State of the Union President Lyndon Banies Johnson State of the Union[/caption]

.

HERE are words that our current Speaker of the House of Representatives and Majority of the House must heed:

.

        “If we fail, if we fritter and fumble away our opportunity in needless, senseless quarrels between Democrats and Republicans, or between the House and the Senate, or between the South and North, or between the Congress and the administration, then history will rightfully judge us harshly.”[4]

.

Therefore, history will judge the 112th and 113th Congress(s) “harshly”. I have written that, using that exact wording, previously here at The Other Shoe. I am comforted and vindicated by President Johnson’s 50 year old evaluation of our last two sessions of Congress. Some final words, from President Johnson (a TEXAN), about the proper duty of Congress.

.

        “Here in the Congress you can demonstrate effective legislative leadership by discharging the public business with clarity and dispatch, voting each important proposal up, or voting it down, but at least bringing it to a fair and a final vote.”[5]

.

Our current Speaker and majority in the House of Representatives need to learn from the past, to avoid being “rightfully judge(ed)… harshly”. Now, on to the passages I failed to share, yesterday.

.

        “Unfortunately, many Americans live on the outskirts of hope—some because of their poverty, and some because of theft color, and all too many because of both. Our task is to help replace their despair with opportunity.”[6]

.

True in 1964, and quite sadly true in 2014. However, today we are told by elements of the Republican party that the path to prosperity for all is not to be shouldered by the Federal government. Rather, we should trust the forces of greed and avarice to correct the crippling poverty that grips tens of millions of Americans. Lying to the American people by saying that ‘the war on poverty has failed… because it was entrusted to the federal government…’ Nothing further from the truth could be spoken, more about that later.

.

First, I want to share with you My Dear Readers the very words that set America on a ‘War on Poverty’ fifty years ago today.

.

        “This administration today, here and now, declares unconditional war on poverty in America. I urge this Congress and all Americans to join with me in that effort. It will not be a short or easy struggle, no single weapon or strategy will suffice, but we shall not rest until that war is won. The richest nation on earth can afford to win it. We cannot afford to lose it. One thousand dollars invested in salvaging an unemployable youth today can return $40,000 or more in his lifetime.”[7]

.

  1.    “declares unconditional war on poverty in America”

  2.     “It will not be a short or easy struggle…” (yet in 1970 President Nixon worked to end or dismantle many of the programs started by that Congress)

  3.     “The richest nation on earth can afford to win it. We cannot afford to lose it”

  4.     “One thousand dollars invested in salvaging an unemployable youth today can return $40,000 or more in his lifetime”


.

Every single fact outlined above is as true today, as it was on January 8th, 1964. Yet, today we fact a poverty rate of nearly 17%. ONLY TWO percentage points shaved off in fifty years! Shame on America.

.

[caption id="attachment_2104" align="aligncenter" width="251"]President Lyndon Banies Johnson State of the Union President Lyndon Banies Johnson State of the Union[/caption]

.

    “Poverty is a national problem, requiring improved national organization and support. But this attack, to be effective, must also be organized at the state and the local level and must be supported and directed by state and local efforts. For the war against poverty will not be won here in Washington. It must be won in the field, in every private home, in every public office, from the courthouse to the White House.”[8]

.

It is unequivocal than (TEXAN) President Johnson understood that poverty was a “national problem” and as such should be addressed on the national stage. Clearly, this was a chore far too large to be handled by the individual states. For those of us that were alive, and politically aware in 1964, we clearly saw states squander funds meant for the poor. We saw many southern states allow “starvation wages” to be paid to employees in their respective states. This is as true today, as it was in 1964.

.

As well, EACH AND EVERY one of these goals are true today, as they were in 1964:

.

Our aim is not only to relieve the symptom of poverty, but to cure it and, above all, to prevent it. No single piece of legislation, however, is going to suffice. We will launch a special effort in the chronically distressed areas of Appalachia. We must expand our small but our successful area redevelopment program. We must enact youth employment legislation to put jobless, aimless, hopeless youngsters to work on useful projects. We must distribute more food to the needy through a broader food stamp program. We must create a National Service Corps to help the economically handicapped of our own country as the Peace Corps now helps those abroad. We must modernize our unemployment insurance and establish a high-level commission on automation. If we have the brain power to invent these machines, we have the brain power to make certain that they are a boon and not a bane to humanity. We must extend the coverage of our minimum wage laws to more than two million workers now lacking this basic protection of purchasing power.”

.

These goals were met, by the Congress of 1964 &1965. By 1968 and 1969 America was gaining in the ‘War On Poverty’. Then, the Vietnam war heated up and the ‘Space Race’ demanded more of our national resources. Further, President Nixon had a particular personal dislike for the programs started under President Johnson, and F.D.R. From the his first days in office, President Nixon sought to cut all of the programs in the ‘War on poverty’ just as they were beginning to show promise.

.

    “Nixon greatly disliked the programs of the War on Poverty--Head Start, the Job Corps, community action--and also Model Cities, the other big Great Society program aimed specifically at the ghettos. "No increase in any poverty program until more evidence is in," he wrote Ehrlichman two months after taking office.”[9]

.

The proof was in the statistics, as seen here;

.

    “…the government began cutting off the route of escape from the ghettos that so many had used in the sixties: government jobs. Simply giving out money doesn't get people out. From the time Nixon took office, the black rate of exit from poverty slowed to a standstill.”

.

Under President Reagan we began to hear the mantras of ‘welfare queens’ and (with help from organizations like the John Birch Society) the mischaracterization of the poor as lazy, shiftless and living on the government dole. These bigoted statements became more of a norm under President(s) Bush, and have hit their stride with daily use on many programs on Fox ‘News’, and Rush Limbaugh.

.

Too many Americans have become intellectually lazy, when it comes to the sociology of poverty, and allow themselves to be caught up in hyperbolic political rhetoric and bigotry. To some extend, I do fault these individuals for the simple fact that; if you are going to make sociological comments. One MUST be able to intellectually explain the underpinnings of their ‘opinion’. Further, they should be able to outline their rejection of previously proven social mechanisms of addressing poverty, as evidenced by the irrefutable evidence of the effectiveness of the federal programs of the ‘War on Poverty’ when fully funded.

.

For six brief years America attacked the poverty in the “richest nation on earth”, then we lost our resolve… then too many good people have fallen prey to hyperbolic rhetoric and bigotry.

.

Now is the time to renew the pledge to ourselves and our posterity. A pledge to eradicate poverty in the richest nation on earth, in our lifetimes. To make sure that all workers in America receive a ‘Living Wage’ and that no child should go to bed hungry. These are reasonable goals, these are obtainable goals.

.

However, to think that simply trusting ‘free enterprise’… greed and avarice to solve our national problem of poverty? Is a lie wrapped in avarice. This is a national goal, for only our national resolve is strong enough to beat back the forces of greed and avarice and free our fellow man… fellow Americans from the terrible grips of poverty.

.

As always I am flattered that you come here and read my work.

.

Thank you!

 

Tuesday, January 7, 2014

The 50th Anniversary of the W.o.P.

            Welcome back My Dear Readers to The Other Shoe. So, what does ‘W.o.P.’ stand for? Two clues. First; our President was Lyndon Baines Johnson when the W.o.P. was started. Second; the ‘W’ stands for War. So, with those two clues can we figure out ‘what’ war was started fifty years ago today? Could it be a ‘War On Politicians’? Not likely, they are still around and messing things up royally. One would hope we would win that war. War on pot?  Wrong. However, if that had been the case we would be loosing that war, too. War on the Phillipines? Nope. War on Prejudice? Wrong, but that is a war that I would happily fight and give my life for.

.

So, what was this war that was started by President L.B.J. fifty years ago today? The War on Poverty. We beat back the Nazis and Fascists in World War II. We fought and beat back, for many years, the North Koreans in the ‘Korean War’.  As well, at the cost of trillions of taxpayer dollars, and thanks to the engine of free enterprise, we beat back Communism and won the ‘Cold War’. Recently, we won a war against a terrible dictator in the sandy hellhole that is Iraq. 

.

However, America has failed, and lost the fifty year ‘War on Poverty’. I write this article for publication on January 8th, 2014 the fiftieth Anniversary of President L.B.J.’s State of the Union Address January 8th, 1964. At the time of this speech, the Poverty Rate in America flirted around 19%. It was higher in some southern states, and in all large urban cities.

.

An empowered and less partisan Congress WORKED TOGETHER to pass the following legislation:

.

[Above information thanks to Wiki]


My Dear Readers, over the past eighteen months I have been doing a substantial amount of research on this subject, poverty. I have endeavored to publish, on a regular basis, on the subject of poverty. Here are five examples of recent publications on this subject:

.

  •  Avarice in America : My problem lies with my fellow man’s avarice. Avarice. Now there is a very old word, a very old word indeed. King Midas had dreams of avarice. King Solomon is what most would see is the epitome of avarice. What follows is the dictionary definition of avarice; “extreme greed for wealth or material gain

  • Pope Francis Strikes AGAIN : ““The great danger in today’s world, pervaded as it is by consumerism, is the desolation and anguish born of a complacent yet covetous heart, the feverish pursuit of frivolous pleasures, and a blunted conscience.”[1]

  • Why Must Congress Cut Food Stamps… NOW? : “When LBJ took over the Presidency from our slain President Kennedy, he did not ride on his laurels or those of his running mate. On January 8th, 1964 (I would have been six) Lyndon Baines Johnson changed America by announcing the beginning of the War On Poverty[2] This war was joined by legislation such as the; ‘Social Security Amendments of 1965’’[3]’, ‘Food Stamp Act of 1964’[4], ‘Economic Opportunity Act of 1964’’[5], and ‘Elementary and Secondary Education Act’’[6]. These laws were passed, all of them, with (what we cannot seem to do for the life of US) Bi-Partisan support! In the House of Representatives and the Untied States Senate these pieces of legislation received wide Bi-Partisan support. The major reason why the strong, and across party lines, support?”

  • The Whittiling of America : “My Dear Readers, right now we’re watching the ‘whittling away’ of America. Let me take a moment and try to explain. What I see in America disturbs me greatly, more than even I can put into words (and that, My Dear Readers is QUITE A FEAT). I see this now, and I just can’t take this ‘whittling away’ at the very core of our country. I see it every day. We all know right now America is only ‘haves’ and ‘have not’s’. The great thing is most that can read, write and speak ARE ‘haves’.”

  •  The Whittling of America – Part Two – Enclaves : “I see a ‘Hooverville’! I just put, My Dear Readers, an embedded link in that last proper noun ‘Hooverville’. Now for everyone that did want to click the link and go to another page? I completely understand. Let me explain, quite simply Hooverville’s were shanty-towns created by homeless Americans during The Great Depression. These shanty-towns were named after Pres. Herbert Hoover, because he was mostly blamed for the advent of the Great Depression. Again, My Dear Readers, this is July 23, 2013!”


.

[caption id="attachment_2093" align="aligncenter" width="416"]Homeless Children in U.S. 2006-2011 Homeless Children in U.S. 2006-2011[/caption]

.

Five articles spanning the past seven months. If you are a regular here @ The Other Shoe? Then you know and understand that this topic is very important, and personal, for me. In 2003 I was living in Westwood, CA in a two bedroom/two bath apartment earning roughly $50,000 a year, not including commission for sales and yearly bonuses. Now, I make just $960 a month in Social Security Disability benefits… and what money I garner via occasional charitable funding campaigns. I live in poverty.

.

Factoids From Latest U.S. Census Numbers




  • The Census Bureau today released data indicating that the overall poverty rate in 2011 was 15.0 percent – statistically unchanged from 15.1 percent in 2010. This represents 46.2 million people living in poverty in 2011.

  • Median household income was $50,054 in 2011, which is a statistically significant decrease of 1.5 percent from 2010.

  • Today’s data indicate that there were 16.1 million children (persons under 18) living in poverty in 2011, not significantly changed from 2010. The child poverty rate was 21.9 percent, not significantly changed from the 2010 rate of 22.0 percent.

  • For African-American children, the poverty rate reported today was 37.4 percent for 2011. The rate for Hispanic children was 34.1 percent. For non-Hispanic, White children the rate was 12.5 percent.

  • Children living in female-headed families with no spouse present had a poverty rate of 47.6 percent, over four times the rate of children in married-couple families (10.9 percent).

  • The poverty rate for people age 65 and over was 8.7 percent, statistically unchanged from 2010.

  • In 2011, 6.6 percent of all people, or 20.4 million people, lived in deep poverty (had income below one-half the poverty threshold, or $11,511 for a family of four).

  • The overall poverty rate of 15.0 percent in 2011 did not change significantly from 2010. In contrast, the poverty rate had risen significantly in seven of the prior 10 years from a recent low of 11.3 percent in 2000.

  • These figures reflect money income only and do not reflect in-kind public supports, tax credits, most ARRA-funded expansions and temporary reductions in the payroll tax. Data incorporating these and other noncash benefits and how they affect measures of poverty will not be available until November.


.

As I said, I am devoting a great deal of time on this subject. Researching and learning, more and more with each and every passing week/month. Just recently I learned about the

 

  • ·        ‘Gini Coefficient’ – The Gini coefficient measures the inequality among values of a frequency distribution (for example levels of income). A Gini coefficient of zero expresses perfect equality, where all values are the same (for example, where everyone has the same income). A Gini coefficient of one (or 100%) expresses maximal inequality among values (for example where only one person has all the income).[3][4] However, a value greater than one may occur if some persons have negative income or wealth. For larger groups, values close to or above 1 are very unlikely in practice.”[7]


.

When this algorithm is used in evaluating the income distribution of the top 133 nations, you are left with a stark and startling realization about America. Please table the graph below:

.

Table 8: Income equality in selected countries




































































































Country/Overall Rank



Gini Coefficient



1. Sweden



23.0



2. Norway



25.0



8. Austria



26.0



10. Germany



27.0



17. Denmark



29.0



25. Australia



30.5



34. Italy



32.0



35. Canada



32.1



37. France



32.7



42. Switzerland



33.7



43. United Kingdom



34.0



45. Egypt



34.4



56. India



36.8



61. Japan



38.1



68. Israel



39.2



81. China



41.5



82. Russia



42.3



90. Iran



44.5



93. United States



45.0



107. Mexico



48.2



125. Brazil



56.7



133. South Africa



65.0




Note: These figures reflect family/household income, not individual income.


Source: Central Intelligence Agency (2010).[8]


.

America ranks 95th behind countries like; Germany, Italy, France, the Untied Kingdom, Egypt, Japan, China and RUSSIA! That is correct, the former United Soviet Socialist Republic (home to Marxism and Communism) beats America in financial equality. I do not know about you, My Dear Readers, but I found this table and the fact it relays quite disturbing. Quite disturbing, indeed. How can it be that the home of free enterprise and modern democracy can find itself in the company of countries like; Mexico, Brazil and South African in income inequality? They are ‘third World’ countries and America finds itself in their company in any statistical model? That just reeks of something seriously wrong. .

Fifty years ago, today, America engaged in a war. Fifty years later, by most measures, America is loosing/lost that war. On January 8th, 1964 the poverty rate in America was 19%. Today, January 8, 2013 the national poverty rate is 15%... well, there is more than just a little debate about that number. I have seen credible research and documentation that places the poverty rate among some cross sections of the American population as high as 17%.

.

[caption id="attachment_2095" align="aligncenter" width="630"]Official and Supplemental Poverty Measure Poverty Rates Official and Supplemental Poverty Measure Poverty Rates[/caption]

((Found here: http://www.census.gov/prod/2013pubs/p60-247.pdf


.

For the sake of argument, and the purposes of this article, let’s use the slightly higher rate of 17%. This means many things, not the least of which is that with fifty years invested in this war and the efforts of three generations America has only managed to shave off 2% points?  My Dear Readers, I cannot manage to put into words the shame I feel (as an America) for that reality. Check out the graphic below for where I get the 17% number.

.

For me, this signals a compete and utter failure on the part of the government of America and… … … and a complete and utter failure of America. Nearly SIXTEEN MILLION CHILDREN suffer (Daily) with hunger! We are not talking about some third world country about children with flies on their faces. We are talking about OUR children in America! How the hell can we sleep at night knowing that sixteen million American children are going to sleep hungry? That is so very unforgivable in the single most prosperous nation in the history of mankind. Doubly unforgivable when you factor in the fact that we are a Christian nation and sixteen of our children are going to sleep, tonight, hungry.

.

“More than one in five children is at risk of hunger. Among African-Americans and Latinos, nearly one in three children is at risk of hunger.”[9]

.

“About half of all American children will receive SNAP benefits at some point before age 20. Among African-American children, 90 percent will enroll in SNAP before age 20”. AND “One in seven people are enrolled in SNAP. Nearly half are children.”[10]

.

For six years I was too embarrassed to apply for Food Stamps. In September of last year… I finally broke down and applied for food aid via Food Stamps. For the next two months, I was really embarrassed to use my SNAP card in public. I would only go to the grocery store very early in the morning, or very late at night. I was embarrassed to be seen using my SNAP card at the check out line. I read the posts on the internet. I hear the anger on some networks. Not only was I embarrassed (severely embarrassed) I was scared. Here is why:

.

        “Our “poor” have big screen TVs and smart phones. ... Bet they all have flat screens, cell phones, A/C and a least one car probably newer than mine.” From: “Wait, what’s wrong with hating poor people?”

AND

        “Totally agree. Where I live, they also carry REALLY nice designer purses, wear designer boots, clothes, drive SUV’s, and seem to shop all day long with about 3 kids each hanging off of them. They also seem to push really nice strollers throughout the mall and usually leave with loads of bags after a day of shopping… I often find myself becoming very envious of them.”[11]

.

These are very popular… sentiments? Myths? Misnomers? LIES? I do not own; and SUV, a “Designer bag”, “designer boots” nor do I “leave (the mall) with loads of bags after a day shopping…” However, the internet is just cram packed with hateful and ignorant postings just like the ones above. That is why I fear using my SNAP card when ANYONE is around and this is a great segway to the next part of my article ‘The War on the POOR!”

.

[caption id="attachment_2096" align="aligncenter" width="619"]Poverty Rate All Persons by Age 2000-2011 Poverty Rate All Persons by Age 2000-2011[/caption]

.

President Reagan uttered these damning words “Greed is Good!” [IMHO this is the moment when the modern day Republican party began to shatter, too], and he is famous for his quotes about ‘welfare queens driving Cadillacs’. These are all old mantras from the John Birch Society of the 1960’s. A good deal of Americas do not know (personally) any ‘poor people’. For a majority of Americas they only know the poor as the person panhandling outside their local grocery store, or people hanging out in public parks drinking from brown paper bags holding bottles of beer or malt liquor. Beyond those encounters, they rely on third party stories of the poor, or out-and-out bigoted, and politically motivated, hyperbolic partisan bigotry told in the form of the well-worn paradigms I have quoted above.

.

This lack of personal experience with the poor, and the resulting reliance on hyperbolic bigoted rhetoric has resulted in tens of millions of Americans ‘blaming the poor’ for anything wrong in society. Before the poor it was… blacks. Before blacks it was ‘them Irish’. Before ‘them Irish’ it was those damn greedy Jews’… and so on, and so on. It is really quite sad and pathetic that so many good Americans and (often) ‘Church going Christians’ have so easily fallen prey to this old and well-worn bigotry. Even sadder, is the fact that many of them so believe what they hear, and parrot, that they honestly do not ‘see’ themselves as bigoted or prejudice.

.

[caption id="attachment_2098" align="aligncenter" width="500"]Wealth Distribution Over Time Wealth Distribution Over Time[/caption]

.

This does not change the fact that they are acting in a bigoted fashion and are spreading prejudice lies and misnomers. They, in their ignorance, honestly believe that America’s poor are (really) better off than themselves and have figured out a way (or worse, been trained since birth) to use the system. That these poor Americans are all malingerers and con-artists proficient in the ways of robbing the government. Whereas, this might be true in a very small (5% or less) cross section of this impoverished demographic grave harm (and often violence) is being done on all poor people based on a multigenerational lie based in ignorance and bigotry.

.

Time and again studies (done by non-partisan organizations like the World Health Organization and universities in America and abroad) have proven that these tales are grossly untrue. Even the Catholic Church has done studies, about these hyperbolic statements, and found no basis in fact for this hyperbolic rhetoric. Regardless of the facts, many Americans still believe this hate filled rhetoric. Often regurgitating their ignorant rhetoric in public and in social media, to the ‘hoots and hollers’ of the like minded and the disgust by all the 90% of the rest of us.

.

[caption id="attachment_2094" align="aligncenter" width="630"]Number in Poverty and Poverty Rate 1959 to 2011 United States Number in Poverty and Poverty Rate 1959 to 2011 United States[/caption]

.

Having studied sociology, in college and later on my own, this is a very well understood sociological sickness/malady. So as not to spend too much time on this topic, and so as to not loose too many readers that might actually gain for this article. This phenomenon is as old as man, and the Hebrew people put a name to it some 3,000-4,000  years ago.

.

Schadenfreude’, or ‘shameful Pride’ is the process of one human gaining self-esteem or pleasure from witnessing the pain and/or suffering of another human. By publicly posting, or boasting, that ‘poor people are not really poor’ they seek to shame poor individuals. Making out other Americans, that might otherwise not differ at all from themselves, as malingers at best and criminals at worst, they seek to improve their own social standing by (figuratively) standing on the shoulders of the poor. Like the sentiment that I posted above:

.

        “Wait, what’s wrong with hating the poor?"

.

They seek happiness/enjoyment from mischaracterizing the suffering of other Americans. I like to remind all those that seek to mischaracterize the poor of this:

.

        “But by the grace of God, go I!”

.

Meaning, that only by the grace of a benevolent God… or the mere luck of your birth, YOU could be poor. I know this all too well, as my change in financial means and social standing horrifically changed from 2003 to 2004 (and now). For me, the difference between a very well paying job… a bright and well compensated job with a Beverly Hills property management company… and my current impoverished state was as simple as the long term result of a typewriter dropping on my head in 1987.

.

In 2002 I was the #1 leasing agent of Domino Realty of Beverly Hills. I was the go-to guy for training new leasing staff and improving the closing stats of a leasing team. I was often sent to other properties (one in Walnut Creek just outside San Francisco) to work with or retrain the leasing staff of a property when they had lower than normal closing numbers. Being the #1 leasing agent I was paid handsomely and often given generous bonuses, especially in years where I traveled often and showed greatly improved closing numbers in a leasing staff, once I left.

.

[caption id="attachment_2097" align="aligncenter" width="630"]Poverty Rates by Age 1959 to 2011 United States Poverty Rates by Age 1959 to 2011 United States[/caption]

.

In the latter part of 2002, I was promoted to Manager of a (once) very beautiful and prosperous property in Westwood. It was originally constructed as The Drake in Los Angeles. (Westwood is actually IN Los Angeles, it is just that all the wealthy people that live in Westwood do not like it being referred to as L.A. Westwood borders on Beverly Hills and Santa Monica). It was an opportunity of a lifetime and I knew that if I could turn the property around, by the end of the year that an Executive position in the company would be in my immediate future. I very much wanted an executive position with this company. To that end, I not only had a plan to turn around the occupancy numbers (I took the property from 70% occupancy to 97% in just three months). I also turned around the resident retention numbers.  

.

I had also developed a plan for obtaining City Landmark status for the building. Los Angeles has rent control within the city boarders. As such, this limited the percentage increase a owner could raise, and it was well below the 10% per annum that the current CEO demanded. However, if I could get the ‘Landmark’ status for my building, it would allow me to raise the rents the 10% per annum the owner wanted. I had a plan to return the property to the very same ‘look’ and ‘status’ it enjoyed as The Drake at the turn of the 20th century. This building once was THE place for; Hollywood stars and Producers, Foreign dignitaries and even Royalty. In the 60’s it was the hotel for the ‘Jet Set’ and was walking distance from THREE of one studio’s Preferred Movie Theaters for Motion Picture Premiers.  Hitchcock’s ‘Psycho’ premiered just two blocks from the front steps of my building.

.

Not only did I have planned the ‘Landmark’ status for the building, I wanted to bring back actors and producers as residents. My first year I rented to Linda Harrison[12] , she played Nova to Charlton Heston’s ‘George Taylor’. She also dated, then married, Studio Boss Richard D. Zanuck. I got to meet her son, Harrison Zanuck[13]- Actor, Producer and Visual Effects for; ‘Apollo 13’, ‘Deep Impact’, ‘Dante’s Peak’ and ‘Strange Days’ just to name a few. With that rental, and the ‘friends’ that Linda introduced me to, I was well on the road to changing my (then) current resident base of UCLA med and law students to retired actors and wives of actors and studio executives/producers. I will also admit, I was very interested in meeting many of these people to further my own entertainment employment future. Killing two birds with one stone.

.

That all became derailed in 2003 when I began having numerous physical and neurological problems… that just could not be ignored or avoided. Employers frown on an employee ignoring a problem that left them in a crumpled heap at the bottom of stairs. I found out, all too quickly, how rapidly a Beverly Hills property management company could see an up-and-coming executive as a liability… when they needed neurological surgery. But, for the Grace of God, go I. One moment #1 leasing agent -> #1 property manager, the next moment… living hand-to-mouth in an extended stay motel. All to well I know the fickle nature of prosperity and heir apparent.

.

I share this for one reason. To make how a good and hard working… very successful (finally) Texan boy can go from ‘Top of the Pile’ to crushing poverty and extreme daily pain and suffering in almost the blink of an eye. I try not to think about all that I lost. Not just the material possessions, but the glowing future and opportunity that I lost.

.

Now, I work as hard as my condition and pain will allow writing for this blog. I refuse to malinger. I refuse to become irrelevant. I still desire to make my mark, write something that people enjoy and make a comfortable life for myself and my husband of 26 years. However, I do now live below the national standard for poor.

.

I personally know the crushing weight of being impoverished in America in 2014. I personally know how cuts to programs like Food Stamps and extended unemployment benefits can translate into poor health… and growing depression. I find myself in a unique position of being able to be the ‘Canary in the Coal Mine’, warning all of you, My Dear Readers, that poor people (like myself) do not own fancy cars, brand new laptops, top of the line 50” LED televisions, and designer clothes.

.

Honestly, I do not eat three meals a day. Doing the very best I can, I cannot afford foods that I know are good for my health, and often must choose foods of poor nutritional value simply because I can get more ‘meals’ into a week or a month… if I eat… poorly. I do my level BEST to not ask for help from; family, friends, and acquaintances. I am deeply ashamed when I do ask for help… and more times than not… I do without food or clothing because my sense of shame outweighs my desire to eat… and live.

.

I am not alone. There really are more Americans like me, than there are Americans milking the system. Honestly, the actual number of ‘millionaire farmers ’is larger than the number of impoverished Americans ‘taking advantage of the system’.

.

This is why I am so deeply upset by these attacks on impoverished Americans. I am upset and genuinely depressed by the ‘War on the Poor’. That is the honest truth, My Dear Readers, here in America talking heads of the radical fringe on ONE political party have literally began and are waging a ‘War on the Poor’. They do it to raise money for campaigns, they work to divide America against American. Quite literally ‘Brother Against Brother’… and I know of this personally.

.

This is not an American trait we should engage in, or be proud of… we should not be supporting and furthering schadenfreude. I am proud of the votes that I have cast, for both Democrats and Republicans. However, the path that the Republican party is being lead… the schadenfreude that some Republicans are engaging in, and furthering. This is not for the good of the Republican party. It is not for the good, or betterment of America. It is time for all good Republicans and Democrats to STOP the “War on the Poor’ and reach out and work together to redouble our national efforts to end poverty.

.

Table 5: Percentage of wealth held in 2000 by the Top 10% of the adult population in various Western countries




















































Country



wealth owned


by top 10%
Switzerland

71.3%


United States

69.8%


Denmark

65.0%


France

61.0%


Sweden

58.6%


UK

56.0%


Canada

53.0%


Norway

50.5%


Germany

44.4%


Finland

42.3%




(Found here: http://www2.ucsc.edu/whorulesamerica/power/wealth.html)

.

It is time to reengage in the ‘War ON Poverty’ and bring and END to the “War on the POOR’! I have faith in my fellow Americans. I have faith in my fellow Texans. I have faith that we CAN work together to bring about and END to poverty in America. One person, one family, one job and one day at a time. I have faith.

.

As always I am deeply honored that you come here and read my work.

.

Thank YOU! .
















Wednesday, August 7, 2013

Unbridled Capitalism vs. Human Strife

        Welcome back, My Dear Readers, to The Other Shoe. Today I am going to write about a concern I am facing with regarding my publications at The Other Shoe. I like to write about news and policy that strikes a personal note, to me. Policy that effects my life, or the lives of people close to me. For the past three years I have written articles on a myriad of subjects. I have never written any article just to lambast a party or political party member.

.

I do not write articles to bias anyone. I do my best to write articles that are, at their core, unbiased. I avoid writing about junk ‘news’ or who is investigating whom. I do not hide the fact that my personal politics are ‘progressive’. I admire President Teddy Roosevelt and President Franklin D. Roosevelt (coincidence or what?) It is my heartfelt belief that America is built on the shoulders of the working class. I believe that concentrating wealth is a ‘Bad Thing’ and has resulted in two major economic downturns (The Great Depression and The Great Recession) have brought economic strife through out our great land.

.

. I am not alone, in that school of thought. As a matter of fact, the majority of ‘Ivy League’ and non-religious (secular) economists agree. Wealth, in America, is built from the ground, up! I also think that our nation’s overall health can be judged by how well the least of us are doing. That America, like many other great civilizations (ancient Athens, Rome, Egypt to name a few) is built by the lower and Middle class. That without health, and a certain amount of wealth, in these working classes your nation will collapse.

.

I learned, in college, history of many past civilizations. There does need to be a wealthy and or ruling class, but without the poor and Middle class’s wealth in mind? Your civilization will collapse. I do not, however, believe that any people should be allowed to take advantage of programs for the; poor, seniors and the disabled. I do not think they should become a way of life. (As a side-note, there are more studies that show this phenomenon is less common than certain politicians claim). I do not believe in Social Darwinism. That just reeks of White Supremacy and Ruling RACE ideals. I have read Ayn Rand’s ‘Atlas Shrugged’ and ‘The Fountainhead’. I have also read L. Ron Hubbard’s ‘Dianeticis’.

.

Having said, I no more believe Objectivism any more than I believe that aliens are responsible for all our ‘Bad Emotions’. I was born to, and raised, in a genuine Middle Class family in the 1960’s and 70’s. We were not rich, but we never went without. In my life I have lived.. poorly. With little income and living hand-to-mouth. I have also had the great fortune and (with hard work) lived and worked in Beverly Hills! I have saved money, often, in my life. I had quite a bit of savings, when I was struck with this malady. I hated that, in fact, I went through it faster than it took to save. When I first got ill and could not work.

.

I do not think it is good for our country for millions of Americans to be homeless. I do not think it is in the best interest of our nation’s future for children to go hungry in the single wealthiest nation in the history of mankind. Regardless of why the child’s family does not have money for food? The child should never go hungry. Period. Neither do I believe that a child of three or four should weigh a hundred pounds (or more). Aye, there’s the rub! See, like a ‘canary-in-a-coal-mine’ I think there is an social… natural indicator of something institutionally wrong. That in one single neighborhood there can be a child nearly starving, going to bed every night hungry. And two blocks over, there is a child the exact same age and they are morbidly obese. THAT, My Dear Readers, is like a canker sore for everyone to see. This, obviously to me, is a sign of an underlying illness (sociologic and economic) much in need of a cure.

.

However, like mankind’s shift from the polytheisms of ancient man, to today’s monotheism. The cure of which I speak would be as; difficult, instrumental, and world shaping. Imagine that, for just a moment. For the past two millennium (two thousand years) mankind (for the most part) now believe in the monotheism of One True God.

However, for nearly ten times the length in time (it is estimated that mankind worshipped many ‘God’(s) for roughly twenty thousand years) polytheism was the truth!

.

We all learned of the Grecian ‘God’(s); Zeus, Athena and Apollo to name just a few.[1] These “God’(s) were worshipped for nearly a thousand years. (from 800 BC to 200-300 AD)[2] In the land of Ur (ancient Mesopotamia) dates back to 3,800 BC and in Ur they were polytheists that believed in Gods in the sky. The father of Abraham (the father of the Hebrew faith, and the beginning of Monotheism) was a maker of statues of these ‘Gods. It was Abraham that is the single man that set in motion the change, for all mankind, the shift from polytheism to our modern day monotheism. The Hebrew Bible (the Torah - Tanakh) was the very first book of its type.[3] The very first time mankind had written down the stories that made up their faith.

.

Mankind has not always believed in “One True God”. In reality mankind has spent more millennium convinced that there were many ‘Gods’ than mankind has spent practicing monotheism. That’s right! We, the people of this planet, are new to this monotheism. It took a thousand years, for this new religion to take root. Many millions of the followers of; Judaism, Christianity and other monotheistic religions DIED in the pursuit of this new faith. This faith that taught “One God rules all things” and not what had been worshipped and believe for ten times two-fold millennium before. However, here we are in a world where practitioners of polytheism are referred to as pagans. A world where billions of human beings believe in the ‘One True God’ be his/her name be; Yahweh, God or Allah.

.

It is this kind of monumental change mankind is facing, today. Capitalism is actually kind of new. It is not always been the engine that drove commerce. For a time, not so long ago, England and Spain built these huge Armadas. Fleets of ships that roved the seas. They would do some exploring, but that was not the reason for their existence. These huge fleets of ships, these Armadas, were built for one reason. Theft!

.

Each country used their armada to steal gold and spices and treasures from the ‘New World’ going back to Europe. This was from around the later part of the Sixteenth century and the beginning of the Seventieth. For several decades… and I found this so flipping amazing when I studied it in college… These two World Powers actually considered stealing from each other Commerce’. They based their entire economies on trading wealth back and forth. Looking back across time… it is pretty nearly hilarious. However, at the time it was happening? They were deadly serious. They were stealing gold and artifacts from cultures they conquered and killed (not creating anything, just killing and stealing). Then, as they were brining these treasure back (again, stolen loot) the opposing faction would attack and steal (yet again) the ill-gotten loot.

.

OK So, you see, back in the latter sixteenth century and well into the seventieth the two largest powers on the planet Earth built their whole economies on theft! The Spaniards would steal from the Incans. While taking the gold and treasure back from the New World the English would raid their ships and steal the loot stolen from the Incans. Then, when the Spanish royal family was low on loot, and just couldn’t get a ship home with the stolen loot. Then the Spaniards would take their armada and steal back the stolen Incan loot. Round and round this went, for several decades, until one day one side woke up and decided that this economic model is unsustainable.

.

My point is that this seemed, for a time, a perfectly normal and viable engine for commerce. Just as the monotheist looks back on polytheism and thinks to themselves how stupid (FYI this is reflected in the tradition of ‘April Fools’ – Pagan vs. Christian). We now look back on the circle of theft that sustained huge Armadas as foolishness. It is in my heart of hearts that do believe that one day (and it may be soon) mankind will look back on the capitalism as the same kind of cannibalistic engine for an economy. That capitalism was an improper and even immoral engine to drive a people’s economy.

.

Then, today, I see an article about the newly sworn in Pope Francis. Pope Francis recently Tweeted:

.

“My thoughts turn to all who are unemployed, often as a result of a self-centered mindset bent on profit at any cost.”[4]

.

He regularly cites the pitfalls of unrestrained capitalism. Speaking on Vatican Radio in May of this year;

.

A society that “does not pay a just wage”, that “does not give work” to people; a society that “that only looks to its balance books, that only seeks profit” is unjust and goes against God.”[5]

.

Further;

.

"Not paying a just [wage], not providing work, focusing exclusively on the balance books, on financial statements, only looking at making personal profit. That goes against God! How many times – how many times – have we read in 'L'Osservatore Romano' .... A headline that impressed me so much the day of the Bangladesh tragedy, 'Living on 38 euros a month': this was the payment of these people who have died ... And this is called 'slave labor!'. And today in this world there is slavery that is made with the most beautiful gift that God has given to man: the ability to create, to work, to be the makers of our own dignity. How many brothers and sisters throughout the world are in this situation because of these, economic, social, political attitudes and so on ... ".[6]

.

And even further;

.

“Today - the Pope said - we can no longer say what St. Paul said: "He who will not work, will not eat," but we have to say: "He who does not work, has lost his dignity", because "he cannot find any opportunities for work". On the contrary: "Society has stripped that person of dignity." [7]

.

Finally;

.

“Today, it would do us good to listen to the voice of God, when he spoke to Cain, saying: "Cain, where is your brother?". Today, however, we hear this voice: "Where is your brother who has no work? Where is your brother who is subjected to slave labor?. Let us pray, let us pray for all these brothers and sisters who are in this situation. So be it"[8] .

I find it reassuring that on the very day I am ready to publish this article. These quotes I find from our current Pope. Comments, so rarely seen from head’s of state, about the crippling income disparity that runs rife through out our land.

.

I do not think that the Pope is attacking capitalism or the wealthy. That is a strategy that would likely fail. I believe that the Pope, like myself, is urgently warning mankind of the pitfalls of unrestrained capitalism! That living just by the bottom line of a ledger is not a viable plan. That we, as a people, as a nation, and a species have to work to create more and equal opportunity. Least our societies collapse.

.

That brings us to the end of (what took three and a half days to write) this article. As always, My Dear Readers, you deeply honor me by coming here to read my words. In closing, I want you to rest assured. I mean no harm or offense to anyone. Thank you!

.

Please Share & Donate


[caption id="" align="aligncenter" width="224"]Daniel's Relocation and General Assistance Fiunding Canpaign Daniel's Relocation and General Assistance Fiunding Canpaigni[/caption]